Customer Services
     
 

Burroughs Run/Poponoe Run Stormwater Control Project

Overview:

Flooding, water quality degradation, and stream bank erosion in the Burroughs Run and Poponoe Run watersheds have been problems for many years. Uncontrolled development in the headwater areas and poor floodplain management practices have further aggravated flooding and reduced the quality of stormwater runoff. Reducing flooding can also lessen the risk of sanitary and combined sewer back-ups caused by stormwater inflow and infiltration. The project was necessary to protect homes and businesses that were impacted by flooding. Click here to read the full Executive Summary of the BR/PR project (1.89 MB).

Before the Burroughs Run/Popenoe Run Stormwater Control Project could move beyond the design stage, individual property owners, both commercial and residential, had to grant MUB rights of way to begin the work. Click here to see the status of each Right of Way.

Q and A for Burroughs Run/Poponoe Run Project

Click on a question and link to the answer.

What is the Burroughs Run/Poponoe Run (BR/PR) project?

What area is affected?

Why is this project necessary?

Why is runoff a problem?

When did plans for this project begin and what prompted it?

Describe the areas that must changed. What all is involved in making the changes?

How much will the project cost, and how will it be paid for?

Are there any grants to help pay for the project?

Will rates go up? Which rates?

What is the timeframe for the project?

What new practices will developers have to adopt?

 

What is the Burroughs Run/Poponoe Run (BR/PR) project?

The Burroughs Run/Poponoe Run stormwater management projec was a solution created by the 2Morgantown Utility Board to reduce flooding and improve stormwater quality in the watershed areas of these two creeks that run through Morgantown.

 

Flooding, water quality degradation, and stream bank erosion in the BR/PR watersheds have been problems for many years. Uncontrolled development in the headwater areas and poor floodplain management practices have further aggravated flooding and reduced the quality of stormwater runoff. Through improvements to the creek channel and to related storm sewer facilities, the BR/PR project helped eliminate flooding of homes and businesses that are located in the vicinities of these two creeks. The project also stabilized the streambanks and stream channel to reduce erosion and, as a result, improved overall water quality of the streams.
TOP

What area of Morgantown was affected?

Properties adjacent to Burroughs and Popenoe Runs were most impacted, but flooding disrupts the lives of many more people who either live or must travel through the area. 3

The Burroughs Run watershed covers approximately 667 acres from Van Voorhis Road through the Suncrest area of the city. It contains 850 single family residences and 5.8 million square feet of non-residential impervious area. The portion of the BR stream that will be improved extends from Van Voorhis Road at Burroughs Street to an area near the National Energy Technology Laboratory just downstream of Woodland Drive.

The Poponoe Run watershed drainage area is 764 acres and contains 815 single family residences and 9.3 million square feet of non-residential impervious surfaces within the project area.   The portion of the PR stream that will be improved extends along Patteson Drive from Takoma Street to an area within Krepps Park, just downstream of Laurel Street. PR will also be improved where it crosses Willowdale Road just upstream of the WVU football stadium.

To view the current and proposed floodplain for the BR project area, click here.

To view the current and proposed floodplain for the PR project area, click here.

TOP

Why was this project necessary?

The project was needed to protect homes and businesses that were impacted by flooding that plagues the area in times of heavy rain. Forty-nine structures were directly affected, 36 in the Burroughs Run vicinity and 13 in the Poponoe Run vicinity. Properties that do not directly suffer flooding were also affected. Negative impacts included loss of access, inconvenience, interruption of normal daily services, and loss of property values.

These indirect impacts conceivably applied to every home and business in the project area. Additionally, the current floodwater flows in Burroughs and Poponoe Runs caused streambank erosion and degraded water quality.

The improvements proposed for this project corrected these conditions. Reduced flooding also lessened the risk of sanitary and combined sewer back-ups caused by stormwater inflow and infiltration.

To view the current and proposed floodplain for the BR project area, click here.

To view the current and proposed floodplain for the PR project area, click here.

TOP

Why is runoff a problem?

Development has exploded in this part of Morgantown. Conditions have been worsened by much of the development being outside of the Morgantown municipal limits where, for years, growth was 4allowed without the controlling standards of the city.

Buildings (including residences), parking lots, driveways and paved streets—what are referred to as impervious surfaces—don’t allow rain to soak into the ground. The rain that is not absorbed is called runoff. As impervious area is added, runoff increases, and all of the runoff water eventually makes its way to Burroughs Run and Poponoe Run creeks.

TOP


 

When did plans for this project begin and what prompted it?

Flooding became more frequent and more severe as commercial, institutional, recreational, and residential growth continued in the area. Frustration among residents and other concerned parties reached a new high on July 19, 1996, when the area received more than five inches of rain in 12 hours. People demanded that something be done.

As a way to resolve the problem, MUB sponsored state legislation to allow creation of municipally owned stormwater utilities. The legislation would allow the utilities to address stormwater needs on a watershed basis so they would not be limited by municipal boundaries. The legislation was enacted in July 2001. Morgantown became the first city in the state to exercise the new authority by enacting a set of stormwater ordinances in May and July of 2002.

MUB began engineering studies in 2003 to analyze the problem and to develop alternative solutions. A preliminary engineering report was prepared in 2004, and project funding was secured from the WV DEP. Detailed project design began in the fall of 2004, but progress was hampered by mid 2005 when it was determined that high land values made construction of proposed detention ponds unfeasible.

The project was redesigned in 2006 to eliminate the ponds (and their high property cost) and to substitute stream channel improvements in their place. The revised design was completed in late 2006. The project is undergoing its final regulatory reviews and is being prepared to solicit construction bids.

TOP

Describe the areas that have to be changed. What all is involved in making the changes?

5Correction of current conditions included extensive improvements to the stream channels. Where streets cross the streams, culverts were replaced with appropriately sized upgrades. These improvements conveyed peak stream flows through the project area with minimal flooding of structures.

The capacity of the Burroughs Run stream channel was increased (going upstream) from Woodland Drive to a point just downstream of the intersection of Burroughs Street and Van Voorhis Road . Natural stream restoration was included in the reconstruction details to the extent practicable in an urban setting. An existing wetland, known locally as Suncrest Lake , through which Burroughs Run flows, was lowered and restructured to fit the new stream profile. A new storm sewer and inlets were installed along Dogwood Avenue from Killarney Street to Lashley Street . This new storm sewer captures and conveys overflow that escaped an existing 90-inch culvert at the intersection of Dogwood and Killarney.

To see an overview of the BR project area, click here.

The capacity of the Poponoe Run stream channel was increased (going upstream) from Laurel Street to Baldwin Street . The close proximity of a major church structure on the northern edge of the stream and Patteson Drive on the southern edge of the stream required the use of vinyl sheet piling to ensure stability of the modified stream banks. A new storm sewer and inlets were built from Baldwin Street to Takoma Street . This new storm sewer captured overland flow from the low point of Patteson Drive and conveys it more efficiently to Poponoe Run. A culvert crossing Willowdale Road (upstream of the WVU football stadium) was also be replaced.

To see an overview of the PR project area, click here.

TOP

How much will the project cost, and how will it be paid for?

The estimated project cost was $7,571,000. The majority of this cost was funded through a WV DEP state revolving fund loan at a three percent interest rate over 20 years. It is notable that this project was the first stormwater project to be financed by this important state funding program. The debt service on this loan will be about $476,000 per year. Revenue to pay this debt service will be obtained by an increase in the rates charged to our stormwater customers.
To view the budget for the BR/PR stormwater project, click here.

TOP

 Are there any grants to help pay for the project?

Yes. The West Virginia Department of Transportation committed to contributing $300,000, and the WV Department of Environmental Protection committed a grant of $250,000 using EPA 319 funds. These grants were applied directly toward the project cost in order to reduce the amount of the loan.

TOP

Will rates go up? Which rates?

Yes. Existing stormwater rates were increased to pay the debt service for the new loan. The Morgantown City Council supported the project knowing that such an increase was 1necessary.

The stormwater utility collects fees from residences and businesses, providing a source of continual funding and financing to fix stormwater-related problems. Residential structures are all charged the same amount based on average square footage of homes, and commercial buildings are charged by actual square footage.

Residential rates remained a flat fee and increased from $3.63 to $5.30 monthly. Non-residential rates remained charged per 1,000 square feet of impervious area and increased from $1.45 to $2.12 per month.

TOP

 

What was the timeframe for the project?

Bids for the BR/PR project were expected to be solicited in late March and early April 2007, and the loan closing followed soon thereafter, late July. Construction began in summer of 2007 and was expected to take 18 months. Project completion was March 2009.

To view the schedule for the BR/PR stormwater project, click here.

TOP

What new practices will developers have to adopt?

MUB has implemented a set of stormwater management practices that are required of all new developments in the utility service area. Two are particularly effective: The first is that all new developments must provide adequate detention of rainwater to ensure that post-development (future) flow rates do not exceed predevelopment (current) flow rates from the site. The second is that redevelopment projects must achieve a 10 percent reduction in runoff flow rates between current conditions and post-development (future) conditions. The stringency of these requirements will increase in August 2010.

To view the ordinances governing stormwater management, click here.

As a result of these new stormwater management practices, flooding and flood-related problems will not become any worse in the future than they are today, regardless of increases in population or growth of new developments. These combined measures offer a real solution to effectively reduce this historic flooding.

TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Web Design and Hosting Services Provided by: